ValueStockFinder

Highlights

Every trading day, ValueStockFinder scans around 3,500 companies to identify where growth momentum is accelerating most. We analyse how revenue and EPS growth develop over multiple quarters and combine this with changing analyst expectations to identify companies gaining momentum.

November 6, 2026: Tower Semiconductor: EPS Growth Turns from -2.20% to 44.40%

Tower Semiconductor's most important fundamental change is a sharp turnaround in quarterly EPS growth, which moved from -2.20% to 44.40%, an increase of 46.60 percentage points. This became observable with the quarterly report published on 2026-05-14, where revenue growth also accelerated from 13.70% to 23.70%. Forward EPS growth estimates subsequently rose from 53.32% to 64.91% between the observations on 2026-08-06 and 2026-08-11.

The improvement indicates strengthening profitability and growth momentum for the specialty foundry, which manufactures analog integrated circuits on platforms such as silicon photonics, SiGe, RF-SOI, and power management. The positive signals align with the company's current focus on customer-backed silicon photonics expansion for AI and cloud optical infrastructure. For a complete assessment of the fundamental profile, including execution and capital-intensity risks, see the full fundamental analysis.

November 5, 2026: Apple EPS Growth Accelerates to 28.70% After September Report

Apple’s quarterly EPS growth accelerated from 10.80% to 28.70%, an absolute increase of 17.90 percentage points, following the quarterly report published on 2026-09-28. Revenue growth also improved from 11.70% to 16.40% in the same comparison against the average of the previous four reported quarters, and the EPS signal reached a trigger rank of 96.00 out of 100.

The forward EPS growth estimate also moved from 8.39% to 12.92% between the observations on 2026-10-30 and 2026-11-03, indicating that analyst expectations for earnings expansion strengthened after the report. Apple operates a vertically integrated ecosystem spanning iPhone, Mac, iPad, wearables, and services such as the App Store, iCloud, and Apple Music, with iPhone accounting for over 50% of revenue. Together, these changes point to broader demand and monetization across its installed base, although the analysis notes that memory costs and AI spending remain margin headwinds. The full fundamental analysis provides further context on these developments.

October 15, 2026: Dell Technologies: Forward EPS growth jumps from 0.83% to 9.59%

Dell Technologies shows a sharp improvement in forward EPS growth, rising from 0.83% to 9.59% within the 30-day window, an absolute change of +8.76 percentage points and a relative change of +1055.42%. At the same time, forward revenue growth increased from 14.77% to 18.44%, and current revenue growth versus the prior four-quarter average climbed from 25.52% to 73.93%. These movements reflect strengthening estimate momentum in Dell's AI-driven infrastructure business, where servers, storage, and networking form the core growth engine.

The company's Infrastructure Solutions Group is benefiting from a multi-year AI deployment cycle, with a broadened customer base and a record order backlog. The full fundamental analysis in the portal examines how these growth signals interact with Dell's profitability, balance-sheet structure, and valuation profile, providing a transparent basis for further independent research.

October 6, 2026: SoFi Technologies: Forward EPS Growth Accelerates to 38.55%

SoFi Technologies' forward EPS growth rose from 36.91% to 38.55%, an increase of 1.64 percentage points, while current revenue growth improved from 14.64% to 17.66%, a relative gain of 20.65%. Both signals rank at the top of their comparison universe, indicating strengthening estimate momentum for the U.S. fintech ecosystem spanning lending, financial services, and the Galileo and Technisys technology platforms.

The upward revisions align with the company's record loan originations and raised revenue guidance, reflecting broad-based expansion across personal, student, and home lending plus fee-based segments. The full fundamental analysis in the portal provides the complete quality, growth, and valuation context for this development.

October 5, 2026: Accenture: Current EPS Growth Turns Positive, Up 15.71 Percentage Points

Accenture’s current EPS growth turned from -3.43% to 12.29% versus the prior four-quarter average (+15.71 pp; +458.55%). Forward EPS growth rose from 5.72% to 8.89%, forward revenue growth from 4.07% to 5.18%, and current revenue growth from 1.21% to 3.52%.

The full fundamental analysis puts this growth into the context of Accenture’s enterprise demand and AI-led reinvention work.

September 28, 2026: Allstate: Revenue Growth Turns Sharply Positive, Up 12.31 Percentage Points

Allstate's current revenue growth shifted from -0.22% to 12.09%, an absolute improvement of 12.31 percentage points relative to the prior four-quarter average. This reflects higher insurance premiums, increased policies in force, and materially stronger investment income in the U.S. property and casualty business.

At the same time, forward EPS growth improved from -21.91% to -21.33%, a relative change of 2.65%. The full fundamental analysis in the portal provides further context on how these changes interact with Allstate's profitability, balance sheet, and long-term business quality.

September 25, 2026: Micron Technology: EPS Growth Accelerates to 302.64%

EPS growth rose from 174.35% to 302.64% (+128.29 pp) and revenue growth from 61.19% to 110.87% (+49.68 pp), both at 100.00 out of 100. For Micron Technology, this reflects AI-driven demand for DRAM, NAND, and HBM.

Forward EPS growth rose from 111.20% to 116.28% (+5.08 pp) and forward revenue growth from 85.27% to 90.80% (+5.53 pp) in the 30-day window. The full analysis in the portal adds broader context.

September 15, 2026: Western Digital EPS Growth Surges to 167% on AI Cloud Demand

Western Digital’s current EPS growth vs. the prior four-quarter average surged from 53.31% to 167.10%, a gain of 113.79 percentage points. This reflects the HDD pure-play benefiting from AI-driven cloud storage demand and tight supply.

Forward EPS growth edged up to 58.03% and forward revenue growth to 36.77% in the 30-day window. The company’s near net-cash balance sheet provides resilience. Read the full fundamental analysis in the portal for a deeper assessment.

September 7, 2026: Marvell Technology: Forward EPS growth jumps 5.85 pp to 59.98%

Marvell’s forward EPS growth increased from 54.13% to 59.98% in the 30-day window, an absolute rise of 5.85 percentage points, ranking at the maximum trigger level of 100.00. Simultaneously, forward revenue growth climbed from 45.12% to 51.28%, and current revenue growth edged up from 9.97% to 10.60%. The upward revisions reflect how the company’s custom AI silicon and electro-optics pipeline is translating into structurally improved earnings visibility, concentrated on hyperscaler data center demand.

These estimate trends align with a business that now derives roughly three-quarters of revenue from the data center segment and operates with an improved growth quality anchored in multi-year design wins. The full analysis in the portal provides a transparent basis to examine the durability of Marvell’s AI-driven expansion and the balance sheet discipline required to support it.

August 31, 2026: Prudential: Forward EPS growth accelerates to 17.09% with a trigger rank of 100

Prudential plc's forward EPS growth estimate has jumped from 12.23% to 17.09% in the latest 30-day window, a relative increase of 39.74% that earned the maximum trigger rank of 100. This signals that analyst expectations for the Asia- and Africa-focused life and health insurer are being revised sharply higher, reflecting greater confidence in its earnings trajectory driven by improving new business margins and operating leverage.

Alongside this, the company's current revenue growth rate surged to 191.85%, compared to an average of 20.47% over the prior four quarters, an absolute change of 171.38 percentage points. This exceptional spike, also at a trigger rank of 100, underscores a powerful operational acceleration for the insurer. For a deeper look at the quality, growth, and valuation drivers behind these figures, the full analysis in the portal provides a data-rich foundation for further research.

August 28, 2026: NVIDIA: Forward Revenue Growth Rises to 44.49%, EPS Growth to 45.03%

NVIDIA’s forward revenue growth rose from 42.47% to 44.49% (+2.02 pp; +4.76%), forward EPS growth from 43.17% to 45.03% (+1.86 pp; +4.31%), and current revenue growth from 41.01% to 43.17% (+2.16 pp; +5.26%). All trigger ranks: 100/100.

This fits NVIDIA’s GPU and AI data-center business and its attractive rating; the full analysis covers demand, supply, and valuation.

August 24, 2026: Vertiv: EPS growth surges from 42% to 83%

Vertiv's current EPS growth jumped to 82.81%, a 40.58 percentage point increase compared to the prior four-quarter average of 42.23%. This acceleration reflects the company's strong position in AI-driven data center infrastructure, where demand for its power and cooling systems remains exceptionally high.

At the same time, forward revenue growth estimates edged up from 28.71% to 29.49% over the last 30 days, and current revenue growth rose from 27.77% to 30.13%. These signals confirm that the market expects Vertiv's expansion to continue. The full analysis in the portal examines the company's competitive moat, valuation, and the risks tied to the current AI capex cycle.

Fundamental Company Analysis

Ticker: TSEM
Region: Middle East and Africa
Sub-region: –
Country: Israel

ISIN: IL0010823792
Industry: Semiconductors

Metric	Value	Peer median
P/E	33.6	–
Forw. P/E	20.4	–
PEG	0.52	–

Fundamental analysis as of 03.11.2026

Next analysis on: –

Difference from the analysis on 14.05.2026

The fundamental case has improved, driven by stronger structural demand visibility in silicon photonics, though execution and capital-intensity risks have risen. The dominant change is that silicon photonics has moved from one of several specialty growth areas to the central structural driver, now supported by multi-year customer commitments through 2029, near-package optics, and integrated-laser roadmaps. This strengthens demand visibility but also concentrates the thesis on AI optical connectivity and on timely capacity qualification. Decisive changes One decisive change is that the growth thesis has shifted from broad specialty momentum to silicon photonics as the primary structural driver. The previous analysis described SiPho and SiGe as volume-driven demand alongside RF, power, and sensors, with technology impact centered on RF/6G and electrification. The current analysis reports SiPho annualized revenue rising from about $180 million in Q2 2025 to $680 million in Q2 2026 and a target of $1.1 billion by Q4 2026, with capacity rather than demand now the constraint. This matters because the long-term case now depends more heavily on AI optical connectivity and less on diversified analog recovery. A second change is that reported profitability improved materially, but its durability is more explicitly questioned. Operating margin rose from 16.1% to 19.6% and ROIC from 10.6% to 14.8%, driven by utilization and mix; however, the current analysis states that not all newly purchased tools have entered depreciation, so current costs do not yet reflect the full expansion burden. This means the quarter's incremental profitability is partly temporary and should not be extrapolated. A third change is that valuation expectations have shifted from a premium with little room for disappointment to a framework centered on execution proof. The previous analysis emphasized limited safety margins; the current analysis sees improved visibility through long-term contracts and prepayments but notes that cash conversion remains constrained by capital expenditure and that re-rating depends on sustainable post-depreciation margins. A fourth change is that financial resilience remains strong but the risk center has moved from debt service to capital commitment execution. The company still has net cash, but operating cash flow of $185 million was broadly matched by $191 million of property-and-equipment investment, equity-to-assets declined from 87.4% to 81.8%, and remaining payments extend into 2027 and 2028. This makes stability conditional on disciplined expansion and sustained utilization. Fundamental profile development The balance between strengths and risks has shifted toward higher structural demand visibility but also higher execution and concentration risk. Earnings visibility has improved structurally through customer commitments, prepayments, and pricing targets, while the current quarter's margin expansion partly reflects temporary factors such as depreciation lag and cyclical analog recovery. Business quality is strengthening in silicon photonics and silicon-germanium, but the competitive position remains moderate: Tower holds only about 0.8%-0.9% global foundry share and faces patent litigation and overlapping specialty competitors. Financial resilience is still supported by net cash and high liquidity, yet capital intensity has risen materially as expansion absorbs operating cash flow. Valuation expectations are now more demanding but also more explicitly tied to proof that contracted infrastructure demand produces sustainable returns after depreciation and capacity ramps. The key distinction is that the structural demand story has strengthened, while the structural cost and execution burden has increased in parallel. Fundamental thesis The original fundamental thesis has been strengthened, but with a narrower and more execution-dependent risk profile. The single most important positive change is the conversion of silicon photonics from a promising specialty niche into a capacity-constrained, customer-backed structural growth platform with multi-year commitments through 2029, near-package optics, and integrated-laser opportunities. The single most important negative change is the increased capital-intensity and execution risk: the expansion program is larger, current profitability does not yet reflect full depreciation, and capacity overshoot or qualification delays could convert committed capacity into underutilized assets. These changes justify a changed fundamental assessment, but not an unqualified one; the durability of the improved earnings profile remains conditional on timely qualification, sustained utilization, and pricing discipline.

Score

(7.6)

Metric	Value	Peer median
Revenue growth YoY	23.7%	–
Revenue growth +1Y	37.2%	–
Total assets growth	–	–
EPS growth YoY	44.4%	–
EPS growth +1Y	64.9%	–
Free cash flow growth	-5'644.6%	–

Revenue

Main growth drivers Tower's latest-quarter expansion was driven primarily by silicon photonics and silicon-germanium connectivity products serving artificial intelligence and cloud infrastructure. Silicon photonics revenue reached approximately $240 million, while demand was supported by customer programs for pluggable optical transceivers and emerging near-package optics. Management also cited stronger demand for power-management technologies across data-center, mobile, and automotive applications, together with continued design-win momentum in radio-frequency silicon-on-insulator and image-sensor products. Growth therefore reflected both higher wafer volumes and a richer technology mix rather than a single pricing event. Capacity, rather than customer demand, is currently the principal constraint: all 200mm fabs operated at high utilization, the 300mm fab remained fully utilized, and newly installed capacity was described as already covered by customer commitments. The next-quarter outlook depends on this capacity becoming productive, not merely on stronger orders. Growth quality The strongest element is the combination of multi-year customer commitments, advanced design activity, and technology migration toward higher-value products. Silicon photonics and silicon-germanium demand is linked to increasing optical bandwidth requirements in artificial intelligence infrastructure, while near-package optics can increase both silicon content and the addressable market. Tower is also developing integrated laser and heterogeneous-integration capabilities, which could broaden its served market beyond conventional transceivers. These are structural drivers, but the current acceleration is not entirely structural: it also reflects a cyclical recovery in selected analog businesses, favorable utilization, and the conversion of previously made capacity investments into shipments. The quality of growth improved through broader customer commitments and higher-value platforms, yet concentration increased toward infrastructure connectivity. Customer prepayments and contracts improve visibility but do not eliminate execution risk, because Tower still has to qualify equipment, achieve yields, and deliver against committed capacity. Management's long-term market-share assertions are supported by high utilization, design wins, and customer extensions, but competition is increasing and the company itself does not provide a precise future market-share measure. 12-24 month development The next 12 to 24 months are likely to be shaped by the ramp of capacity already being installed across Israel, the United States, and Japan. Management expects the current expansion to materially increase silicon photonics starts as new wafers move through fabrication and shipment cycles, while the Track-1 Japan 300mm buildout is targeted to begin production in 2027. Near-package optics engagements with more than 10 existing customers, higher-speed optical formats, integrated lasers, and new material platforms provide additional avenues for content growth, but adoption timing remains dependent on customer qualification and system-level deployment. The company expects limited normal seasonality because demand and start plans point to continued sequential expansion, although this is a management target rather than secured revenue. Broader analog growth should remain supported by automotive, mobile, industrial, and data-center applications, while radio-frequency mobile is expected to recover after capacity was repurposed toward optical products. The key normalization risk is that exceptional incremental growth and utilization benefits may moderate once capacity additions become fully absorbed and depreciation rises. The largest operational risk is inability to qualify and ramp new capacity quickly enough to meet customer commitments, potentially causing bottlenecks, delayed shipments, or lower yields. Growth conclusion The latest quarter strengthens the growth thesis because demand was accompanied by high utilization, expanding customer commitments through 2029, accelerating silicon photonics and silicon-germanium programs, and visible capacity deployment rather than relying solely on inventory normalization. The single most important structural driver is Tower's position in specialized optical-connectivity manufacturing for artificial intelligence and cloud infrastructure, reinforced by long-term customer alignment and migration toward near-package optics, integrated lasers, and higher-bandwidth products. The greatest risk is execution against an unusually ambitious capacity and technology ramp: construction, equipment installation, process qualification, yields, customer adoption, and supply-chain reliability must all progress in sequence. In addition, competition from other photonics suppliers, the cyclical nature of semiconductor demand, and geopolitical exposure affecting Israeli operations could weaken the conversion of customer commitments into realized revenue.

Score

(7.3)

Metric	Value	Peer median
ROCE	9.1%	–
ROIC	14.8%	–
EBIT margin	19.6%	–
Trailing EPS	22.9106	–

ROCE

Tower’s latest-quarter profitability was driven by operating leverage from higher fab utilization and a richer mix of silicon photonics, silicon germanium, and other differentiated technologies. Gross profit expanded faster than revenue, while operating expenses grew more slowly than gross profit, producing a materially stronger operating result. The economic mechanism is clear: additional wafer shipments are flowing through an existing operating structure, while long-term customer commitments support capacity utilization and reduce the risk of underused fabs. Pricing also appears supportive because management cited long-term contracts with pricing targets, higher blended prices for 2027, and higher starting prices for NPO products. However, part of the unusually strong incremental profitability is temporary: not all newly purchased tools had entered depreciation, so the current cost base does not yet reflect the full burden of the capacity program. Capital efficiency therefore improved operationally, but the company is simultaneously committing substantial capital to expansion, making future returns dependent on timely qualification, high yields, and sustained utilization. The current profitability level is supported by structural mix improvement, customer-backed capacity expansion, and operating discipline, but it should not be extrapolated mechanically. Management expects incremental gross profitability to moderate as depreciation from the remaining expansion tools begins, even while higher-value products and pricing may offset part of that pressure. The company’s reported capital position is strong, and customer advances provide funding support for capacity investments, yet free cash generation is being absorbed by heavy capital expenditure. Further improvement depends on converting new capacity into revenue without bottlenecks, maintaining pricing in the face of competition, and preserving yields as products become more complex. Key headwinds include depreciation, qualification costs, potential underutilization if customer demand falls short, semiconductor cyclicality, and geopolitical or operational disruption. Profitability quality improved, but its durability depends on execution and utilization rather than on a purely fixed-cost or pricing-led structural change.

Score

(7.9)

Metric	Value	Peer median
Net debt / EBITDA	-0.2	–
Net debt / FCF	0.0	–
Debt / Capital	4.4%	–
Interest coverage	–	–

Net debt / EBITDA

Balance-sheet position Tower entered the latest quarter with a strong liquidity profile and low financial leverage. The ratios provided show that net debt remained negative and unchanged from the prior quarter, while net debt relative to free cash flow remained 0; this indicates that cash and liquid investments materially exceed debt and that debt is not currently the primary constraint on financial resilience. On its Q3 earnings call, the company reported approximately $4 billion of assets, approximately $3.2 billion of shareholders’ equity, and a current ratio of approximately 3.7x. Customer advances, including prepayments connected with future silicon photonics capacity, provide an additional source of operating liquidity, although they are recorded as liabilities and represent obligations to deliver capacity or services rather than unrestricted financing. Liquidity and equity capitalization currently provide a substantial buffer against ordinary operating stress. The debt-to-capital measure remained unchanged at 4.3899011454341, and the supplied interest-coverage metric is unavailable; therefore, the assessment should rely on the cash surplus, operating cash generation, and disclosed debt balances rather than on a calculated coverage ratio. There is no evidence in the supplied quarter-to-quarter metrics of a deterioration in leverage. Resilience and structural risks The company generated $185 million of operating cash flow in the latest quarter, compared with $191 million of property-and-equipment investment. This demonstrates strong internal cash generation but also shows that expansion absorbs most operating cash before financing effects. Management stated that the remaining payments for the current capacity program are expected through the first half of 2027 and that subsequent Japan investments will require additional spending in 2027 and 2028. The balance sheet can therefore withstand normal downturns better than a highly debt-funded manufacturer, but resilience depends on maintaining utilization and collecting customer-linked advances while new capacity is qualified. The central stability risk is not current debt service; it is the scale, timing, and execution risk of capital commitments. A semiconductor downturn, delayed customer ramps, lower orders, qualification problems, or prolonged underutilization could weaken cash conversion and leave the company with underabsorbed depreciation and fixed costs. Additional risks include refinancing or funding needs for new facilities, interest-rate and currency movements, geopolitical disruption affecting Israeli operations, and possible covenant pressure if debt rises materially. Stability appears secured under the current low-leverage structure, but long-term resilience is conditional on disciplined expansion and sustained customer demand.

What other investors say

“With thirty-odd individual positions, I was permanently behind on knowing where they stood. The nagging sense that I owed myself a few evenings of research — that’s what went away.”

Steven, Zurich

“The screening is simple and systematic, and it keeps surfacing companies I’d never have come across. A lot of what’s on my list now, I found that way.”

Andreas, Zurich

“The written analysis is what sold me. Numbers tell you where a company stands, not why it got there. Here I get both.”

Ben, New York

“My watchlist used to be a list of names I’d meant to get back to. Now it tells me when something actually moved.”

Samantha, Nashville

Notice: ValueStockFinder does not provide investment advice and does not issue recommendations to buy, hold or sell securities or other financial instruments. We are neither a provider nor an intermediary of financial products and do not name, recommend or arrange such providers.

We analyse listed companies exclusively from a fundamental perspective. The analyses are created automatically with the support of artificial intelligence; the underlying data comes from external sources, for whose accuracy and completeness no guarantee is given.

The content is provided for your own independent decision-making and does not take into account the personal financial situation, investment objectives, knowledge, experience or risk tolerance of users. Every investment decision is made at your own responsibility. Investments involve risks and may result in losses.

Learn more about our data sources, research process and analytical methodology in Analysis Methodology.

Highlights

Tower Semiconductor Ltd.

Fundamental analysis as of 03.11.2026

Signals

What other investors say

Highlights

Fundamental analysis as of 03.11.2026 ?Two days after quarterly results are published, a full new fundamental analysis is created for each company.

What other investors say

Fundamental analysis as of 03.11.2026